 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

The Story of Colors cover left and
the author, Subcomandante Marcos, right. |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cinco
Puntos Press, a small press located in El Paso, Texas, was recently awarded
a $15,000 grant from the National Endowment of the Arts to translate and publish
an illustrated children's book titled The Story of Colors. Earlier
this month, the grant was cancelled when William J Ivey, the chairman of the
NEA learned that the author of the book is Subcamandante Marcos, the leader
of the Zapatista guerrillas of southern Mexico. The application for the grant
had passed sever levels of review required by the NEA over the last year and
was just waiting for payment when Ivey received a call from a reporter at the
NY Times regarding the book. The NEA said it was highly unusual for the chairman
to step in at the last moment to override the decision of the review committees
(one of which, the 26-member National Council on the Arts, includes 6 federal
lawmakers) and added that this marks the first time that Ivey has rejected a
grant.
The book, illustrated in full color by Domitila Dominguez, a Mexican artist,
tells the story of how the gods grew bored with the grey colored universe and
how they went about inventing the colors, one by one. The text includes elements
that may be considered controversial to mainstream America. the story is told
through the rebel leader, who sits down and lights his pipe while he waits to
hear a tale from an Indian elder named Antonio. The book begins with the sentence,
"The men and women were sleeping or they were making love, which is a nice
way to become tired and then go to sleep." The accompanying illustration
depicts a reclining naked woman in a sexual embrace with the figure of a male
god.
There is no reference to the Zapatista cause in the book, and Ivey has stated
that he was not concerned about the book's contents but that he feared that
payments for the rights to the title might find their way to the Zapatista rebels.
"I am very aware about disbusting taxpayer dollars for Americans' cultural
life, and it became clear to me as chairman that this just wasn't right for
the agency. It was an inappropriate use of government funds," he said.
Bobby Byrd, the publisher of Cinco Puntos Press, said that there was no risk
of that happening, as Marcos does not believe in copyright and waived his rights
upon the original publication, in Spanish, of the title by Colectivo Callejero
located in Guadalajara, Mexico. The rights paid by Cinco Puntos would go to
Colectivo Callejero for the use of the artwork.
On March 10th, the Lannan Foundation, a private foundation in Santa Fe, NM,
agreed to give $15,000 to subsidize Cinco Puntos to publish the bilingual book.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q
- Why do evergreens keep their leaves?
A - Evergreen trees do not keep their leaves indefinitely, but rather may grow
new ones before the old ones fall, or keep some and drop others over a period
of time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last
week's question ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanley
Kubrick, a film master, has died at the age of 70. Kubrick, who was always trying
to reshape the world of cinema, helped to push the boundries of American film.
His films were full of psychological references and he constantly portrayed
an intelligence rarely seen in mainstream cinema. At the time of his death,
he was working on a film adaptation of an Arthur Schnitzler novel, called "Eyes
Wide Shut." He will be greatly missed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is your favorite Stanley
Kubrick film?
Unanimous - Dr. Strangelove
Our favorite memories/messages from our readers about Stanley Kubrick-
Sent by Joseph Bosch
About Stanley
Of all the directors I've known Stanley was the most umbilical with his
audience. It was not only that he had a total grasp of image, story, performance,
music, sound effects and editing. He knew more about these things than the
accredited professionals in their fields. He even knew more about motion
picture accounting than the bean counters but he had the naivete to think
it would impress the producing conglomerates into trusting him. They know
that there is no trusting an artist.
He is the only director I know who forced some poor assistant to view every
frame of every print that was shipped to cinemas, and this ran to thousands
of prints. He knew the larcenous nature of film labs and knew they would
try to "bury a print in the release schedule" if they were not watched assiduously.
Much is made of his reclusiveness, but no fine director wants to take part
in the ritual demanded by brown-nosing, treacherous interviewers and biographers.
As soon as he could he told the leeches to get lost, as do we all when we
can.
He had the usual tough time emerging from the swill industry and he did
it, too, with craft and opportunism. Nabakov told me that Stanley never
revealed his intention on LOLITA. Nabakov did the screenplay in awe of Stanley
but only on seeing the completed film in his neighborhood cinema did he
realize that Stanley had changed the age of the heroine from 12 years old
to 16 or 17.
Stanley knew what a clunky actor Kirk was, with his dimple the most expressive
part of his equipment. Yet he made SPARTACUS after PATHS OF GLORY and learned
(oh! he learned!) how vain a star can be. Yea, verily unto the destruction
of a movie!
When Stanley finally got the power to do his art the flowering of his genius
became possible. No one has made a political comedy better than DR. STRANGELOVE.
Only Chaplin is in his class.
It is true that he was short on the niceties with his crews. He was distracted
by the need to control every nuance or see it probably go lousy.
He was devoted to his family with a ferocity rarely seen. I remember that
when we were both making films in Ireland we both got death threats, his
specifically directed at his children. We talked about it and agreed that
it wasn't the IRA, it was some disappointed actor who dropped a few pence
in a coin-box phone and played at being a terrorist. Stanley didn't want
to find out. He shifted production of BARRY LYNDON overnight to Salisbury
Plain.
We'd better see his like again or we're in bad shape.
Sent by Dana Cook
Arthur C. Clarke on front-projection
(...) He [Murray Leinster] developed many original ideas, and patented at
least one of great ingenuity and commercial value. It was the "front-projection"
system which enabled Stanley Kubrick to shoot __2001's__ "Dawn of Man" sequence
in a genuine African location -- without leaving London. (...) I can still
recall my amazement when Stanley first showed me the principle of front-projection
in the MGM Studio at Elstree, just north of London. We stood at one end of
the set, facing the huge screen of retro-reflective ("cat's-eye") material
covering the far wall. Stanley lit a match -- and its image came straight
back at us, its brilliance apparently undiminished after a journey of more
than a hundred feet. (Elstree, England, 1960s)
(Source: Arthur C. Clarke, __Astounding Days: A Science Fictional Autobiography__
(New York: Bantam, 1990), p. 21.
Michael Caine on the source of his music
I also made friends with another fascinating man -- the American director
Stanley Kubrick. He had settled in England and I often used to go to his place
just outside Elstree Studios to watch movies in his home cinema. (...) When
Stanley was making __2001:A Space Odyssey__ I clearly remember him choosing
the music for the film. He had a ticket for the local library, where you could
not only borrow books but take out gramophone records, too -- but only one
at a time. This meant that Stanley would go to the library each day, come
back with one record, listen to it, then start the whole process all over
again. One day, he announced that he had found the right theme for the film,
and it was called __Also sprach Zarathustra__ by Strauss. I had no idea what
this sounded like, but now it is familiar to us all as the theme from __2001__,
courtesy of Elstree public library. (Elstree, England, late 1960s)
(Source: Michael Caine, __What's It All About? : An Autobiography__ (New York:
Turtle Bay Books / Random House, 1992), pp. 215-16.
Sent by Richard Baxstrom
Watching 'The Killing' and realizing that 'Reservoir Dogs' had already been
made, only better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |